For Immediate Release:
July 18, 2005
The Assistance Association for Political
Prisoners-Burma (AAPP) today filed the case of prisoner of
conscience, U Win Tin, with the UN, asking for a ruling regarding
his continued arbitrary detention.
On July 6, 2005, the State Peace and
Development Council (SPDC) announced the release of several
prisoners, many of whom were political prisoners. U Win Tin
was believed to be among those to be released. According to
U Soe Myint, an elected MP just released from Insein prison,
where U Win Tin is detained, the authorities told U Win Tin
of his imminent release and took him through the standard
procedures prior to release. He was told that he and nine
other prisoners would need to meet with the Minister of Home
Affairs prior to their release. However, while waiting for
this meeting, U Win Tin was asked to come to the prison office
only to be then taken back to his cell. No explanation was
given for this decision.
This was not the first time that U
Win Tin was forced to participate in such a charade. In November
2004, the SPDC also released several political prisoners,
again in an effort to deflect international pressure. At the
time, the Foreign Minister, Kyaw Thu, stated "Win Tin
is already on the list" of those to be released. However,
U Win Tin was not released and again no explanation was given.
"These two incidents with U Win
Tin are examples of the use of psychological torture by the
SPDC to demoralize political prisoners." said Tate Naing,
Secretary of the AAPP, "By informing U Win Tin that he
was to be released and then continuing to detain him, the
regime clearly intended to break his spirit."
Torture is endemic in Burma's prisons.
While the regime's methods of physical torture are well known,
it's use of psychological torture is less known, but just
as prevalent. Psychological torture is the worse form of torture,
as it can leave prisoners with mental anguish that lasts their
whole lifetimes, long after their release.
Informing prisoners they are to be
released and bringing them to the prison gate only to take
them right back to their cell is one common form of psychological
torture. Other methods include deprivation of food, water,
sleep, showers and use of the toilet. Political prisoners
also are frequently isolated from their fellow political prisoners,
kept in solitary confinement and denied human contact. This
denial of human necessities makes the prisoner begin to feel
they are loosing touch with their normal senses, and creates
a situation where all track of time is lost.
Further, political prisoners are subject
to witnessing the torture of others and to hearing tortured
screams coming from the cells of their colleagues. Frequently,
the lives or well-being of the prisoner's family and colleagues
are threatened, leaving the prisoner to feel helpless and
ashamed that their actions may have caused hurt to those they
love.
In addition to threats to those closest
to them, political prisoners face threats of physical abuse
and even death. Under these threats, they are forced to denounce
their participation in the struggle for democracy and human
rights, and are made to sign documents saying they will never
again participate in such activities. They are often also
made to sign documents stating that the have not been tortured.
The intention is to breakdown the identity of activists, leaving
them without self-respect or confidence in their actions.
The SPDC uses torture as a "weapon
against democracy," seeking to break the most valiant
advocates of democracy and human rights and instill fear and
complicity in the hearts and minds of the Burmese population.
U Win Tin will likely continue to face
such torture as he remains confined to his cell to serve out
the rest of his unjust sentence. He has been detained in Insein
prison for sixteen years, and has received three consecutive
sentences totaling 20 years. His detention was politically
motivated as prior to his arrest he was a founding member
of the National League for Democracy (NLD) and one of the
most strident opponents of the regime. He has never received
a fair trial nor been allowed legal representation as documented
in the publication Pleading Not Guilty in Insein. In 1996,
he was again sentenced for his attempt to send a report detailing
the ill-treatment and inhumane prison conditions in Insein
prison to the UN Special Rapporteur on Burma.
The AAPP has submitted his case to
the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, a UN body, which
typically issues a ruling within ninety days of receiving
a petition.
"Despite the psychological torture
that he has been made to endure, and his continuing arbitrary
detention, U Win Tin's spirit will remain strong." continued
Tate Naing, "The SPDC cannot continue its arbitrary detention
and torture indefinitely, as activists for democracy and human
rights will continue to speak out on behalf of the imprisoned.
The torturers feel safe to torture when their actions are
hidden in the dark; we will light this darkness and expose
the SPDC for the torturers that they in fact are."